Ghana’s parliament has passed a sweeping anti-LGBTQ+ bill that introduces jail terms for same-sex acts and imposes significant legal restrictions on those identifying as gay, lesbian, or transgender. The legislation, which has been years in the making, now awaits presidential assent before it can become law and has drawn a sharp divide between domestic supporters and international human rights advocates.
What the Bill Contains
The new legislation criminalises same-sex relationships and imposes prison sentences on individuals convicted of same-sex conduct. The bill also targets advocacy for LGBTQ+ rights, making it an offence to promote, support, or fund activities deemed to advance the interests of LGBTQ+ individuals and communities within Ghana.
Supporters of the bill in parliament argued it reflects the values and cultural norms of Ghanaian society, with many lawmakers citing religious beliefs and community standards as the basis for their support. The bill passed with a significant majority, reflecting the broader political consensus in the chamber on the issue.
Reactions at Home and Abroad
Within Ghana, the bill has received support from many religious leaders and community groups who have long campaigned for its passage. Churches and mosques across the country have voiced approval, framing the legislation as a protection of family values and national identity.
International reaction has been sharply critical. Human rights organisations, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, condemned the legislation as a dangerous step backward for civil liberties in Ghana and called on the president to refuse assent.
Western governments and United Nations representatives also expressed concern, warning that the bill could expose LGBTQ+ individuals to heightened risk of violence, discrimination, and persecution. Several development partners indicated they would review their bilateral agreements with Ghana in light of the legislation.
What Happens Next
The bill now moves to President John Mahama, who has not publicly indicated whether he will sign or veto the legislation. Legal analysts note that a presidential veto would be politically contentious given the strong parliamentary support the bill has received.
Human rights advocates have pledged to mount legal challenges if the bill is signed into law, arguing it violates constitutional protections and international human rights obligations to which Ghana is a signatory. The coming weeks are expected to bring intense political and legal scrutiny as all sides await the president’s decision.
